 You Can't Click on Pedro
by Mike Carlon
Pedro. If you have ever driven on I-95 in the Carolinas and encountered one of the hundreds of billboards for South Of The Border, you know Pedro. This advertising campaign is memorable for two reasons: 1) the copywriting: "Pedro's weather forecast: Chili Today, Hot Tamale," "You Never Sausage Such a Place," and "You're Always a Wiener at Pedro's;" and 2) the frequency - these billboards are seen constantly for hundreds of miles and almost everyone who has driven that stretch of road remembers them.
According to a recent article in Business Week magazine, billboard advertising is making a comeback. Many in the industry have likened banner advertising to billboards, so let's look at their similarities and differences.
Banners and billboards are similar in that they hit people when people are going somewhere else and not necessarily in a position to react or buy at that specific moment. Also, the two forms are seen for mere seconds so they have to get to the point quickly. Lastly, while people claim they pay little attention to these two forms of advertising, both billboards and banners have been shown to have a branding effect.
Where banners have an edge is in their ability to target, the interactivity they allow, and the added ability to control variables like ad exposure levels (frequency).
So why is it that people see billboards as branding tools but not banners? They communicate in similar ways. In fact, the capabilities in the online world make it easier to measure branding. Imagine if South Of The Border evaluated their billboards by click-through? They would think it was an ineffective campaign even though they generate a lot of business. Just because you can measure banners ads by click-through doesn't mean it is the most appropriate way. After all, when was the last time you clicked on Pedro?
For four years, Mike has been conducting marketing research for advertisers including, Citibank, Delta Airlines and Unilever. You can write to Mike at mike@dynamiclogic.com
|
 Wireless Ads - Can They Build Brands?
by Molly Hislop
As interest in advertising via wireless devices gains more speed, questions are rising about the versatility of the medium. Many believe that the wireless ad world is similar to Internet advertising circa 1994 - not very pretty, and very direct marketing focused. The small screen and slow download speeds certainly limit the use of rich media type advertising, but that does not mean wireless has no branding potential.
The barriers to rapid growth of wireless advertising come from opposite ends of the spectrum. First is consumer acceptance. People will have little patience for wireless ads if they make accessing information more cumbersome and provide no value. Many consumers do not understand that most of the free content on the Internet is only free because it is ad supported. If the trade off between paying for wireless content and viewing ads is truly understood, this acceptance issue may change.
The second limitation lies with the technology. The available colors and images are reminiscent of DOS. The space to articulate a value proposition is the size of a stamp. Fortunately for marketers, the wireless device manufacturers are introducing more advanced hardware quickly, and will ideally cater to the creative goals of the advertising business.
What value will wireless bring to the advertising table? The "notice-rate" will be higher since the ads will not appear on the outer periphery on the screen, and will thus be harder to tune out. The more people who view the ad - even if they see it while scrolling through content - the more likely it is to have a lasting impression.
So, can brands be built through wireless advertising? Yes. It will not be as easy as it has been in other media. The skill will lie in turning the limitations into assets. The space limitation may just be a blessing in disguise.
Molly Hislop has conducted online and traditional data analysis for such clients as AT&T and American Express. You can write to Molly at molly@dynamiclogic.com
|