 In lieu of mind reading… by
Molly Hislop
Atticus Finch said it best at the end of To Kill a
Mockingbird when he told his children, "You never really
understand a person until you consider things from his point of
view, until you climb into his skin and walk around in it." His
point is relevant to many things in life, including the findings of
the clutter study Dynamic Logic released at the ARF conference in
Chicago. That research showed that the perceived clutter level was
more relevant to advertising effectiveness than the pre-defined
clutter levels of a given web page.
When designing a site it is important to understand the
visitation experience from the users' perspective and not just
presume to know what they think. A site rollout affords only one
opportunity to win over first time visitors. The likelihood of
creating a loyal user base will only increase if the site is
designed from the actual users' perspective - not based on
assumptions of what will be appealing or compelling to users. This
will help convert a casual user into a repeat and ultimately loyal
visitor, which will best position the site to attract advertisers
looking to communicate with an engaged user base.
There are many ways to gather this insight - focus groups,
qualitative research (surveys) and IDIs (In-Depth Interviews), just
to name a few. Regardless of how you gather the intelligence, listen
to how users feel and apply that feedback to the design of a
user-centric media property.
Leave the mind reading up to Miss Cleo.
molly@dynamiclogic.com
|
New Rules of Clutterby Jeffrey Graham
In traditional advertising research, the number or
amount of advertisements within a given block of program content
generally defines clutter. Several studies have shown that a high
amount of clutter can reduce advertising effectiveness in offline
media.¹ The fact that clutter can reduce ad effectiveness is
logical. It is likely that a lone billboard ad on a highway in the
desert will be noticed more than the same billboard in the middle of
Times Square. Intuitively, it seems harder to break through a highly
cluttered environment than a bare one.
On the Web, however, it's not appropriate to define clutter by
the number of ads per page. Some sites have four or five ads, but if
the site is clean and well organized, the ads' visibility can be
high. Other sites are so busy with links, graphics, and animation
that even a lone ad can be hard to notice. Indeed, as AdRelevance
has found, the range of the number of ads per page on top Web sites
is small.
Dynamic Logic decided to apply a simple formula for defining clutter--counting the number of "elements" (words, pictures, graphics) on a page. We started with a page from iVillage, a site that has scored better than average compared to Dynamic Logic norms, and made changes to the page, making high, medium and low clutter pages. While our definitions did not create significant differences, we still found that clutter is important. However, like beauty, clutter is in the eye of the beholder---in this case, Web users.
As with many comparisons between traditional and online
advertising, the game appears to be very similar with a few
different rules. Depending on the nature of various media, clutter
is defined in different ways; however, it seems that clutter affects
advertising effectiveness regardless of where it appears.
¹Webb, Peter H. and Michael L. Ray, "Effects of TV
Clutter." Journal of Advertising Research 19, 3 (June 1979): 7-12).
jgraham@dynamiclogic.com
|